Skurka-blog-update-150

Alaska-Yukon Expedition: Wilderness Redefined

ByMary Anne Potts
August 16, 2010
4 min read


Follow
adventurer
Andrew
Skurka

as he skis, hikes, and rafts 4,720 miles through eight national parks,
two major mountain ranges, and some of North America's wildest rivers in
Alaska and the Yukon from March to October. Read his blog updates
here.

I grew up in a Masschusetts suburb where I found
"wilderness" in abandoned gravel pits and marshy wetlands that had escaped
development. Later trips to New
Hampshire’s Presidential Range and Maine’s Mahoosuc Mountains made my childhood
playgrounds seem tame, and through high school they set my standards for what
constituted wilderness. But the goal
posts continued to move in synch with the magnitude of my adventuring: North
Carolina's Blue Ridge Mountains, Colorado's Indian Peaks, the Greater
Yellowstone Ecosystem, and the Colorado Plateau all seemed as wild as it could get,
until I found something that was wilder.

When I plotted the Alaska-Yukon Expedition route I suspected
that my concept of wilderness would be reset repeatedly, e.g., Alaska’s
northwest coast would set the bar in March but be outdone by the western Alaska
Range in April, which might seem mild compared to the Lost Coast in June. But I knew that no section would rival the
wilderness along my route through Canada’s northern Yukon Territory
and Alaska’s eastern Brooks Range. It was to be 625 miles (the length of Montana) with no road crossings, no village
stops, and minimal odds of seeing another human being. I figured it would take 3-4 weeks and I had a
food cache flown in beforehand in order to make it calorically feasible.

I pulled into Coldfoot earlier this week after spending 24
days in what I believe is actually a different category of wilderness, as opposed to just being of a higher grade. I’m inclined to call it “big wilderness,” “real
wilderness,” or “true wilderness”–or perhaps just “wilderness” if everywhere
else I’ve traveled gets demoted to “backcountry.” I’ve never felt so exposed or vulnerable; I’ve
never moved with such vigilance and caution; and I’ve never felt so
self-dependent–I was way out there
and completely on my own, with no
chance that my satellite phone or high-tech wardrobe could compensate for stupidity
or simple error. And I couldn’t force my
will on this wilderness, but instead had to work on its terms, e.g. I traveled
when the weather was good and stopped when it was bad, and made huge route
detours to follow good caribou trails and to avoid crossing flooded rivers. My prevailing emotion was not joyful bliss
like it is when I’m in California’s High Sierra or Wyoming’s Wind River Range,
but instead I was apprehensive and frightened.

Perhaps most significant of all, in this “real wilderness” I
felt like I was just another creature – on par with the bears and
ground squirrels – that had been reduced to the very basic task of making it to
tomorrow by surviving the challenges of today (e.g. tussocks and muskeg,
powerful storms, floods, predators, hoards of mosquitoes, limited food supply,
etc.). The challenges were normally not prohibitive
and were sometimes even non-existent, but I nonetheless moved with the constant
awareness of the fragility of life, which in this environment is a gift that Mother
Nature graciously allows but sometimes cruelly takes away.

FREE BONUS ISSUE

Related Topics

Go Further